Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Power, Peace, and Mark Ruffalo
            
On Monday night, I had the pleasure of watching the famous actor and environmental activist Mark Ruffalo talk in front of a culmination of Dickinson’s faculty, staff, and students. Ruffalo’s interview with Professor Amy Farrell was incredibly done. The entire interview was natural, conversational, and it was easy to stay invested in the topics that they were discussing. At first, I did not believe that the topics that Ruffalo would be covering in the interview would relate in any way to any of the topics that we were discussing in International Relations. However, I couldn’t have been more wrong. Ruffalo touched on a variety of topics, from activism and environmental justice to civil rights and protecting indigenous cultures in America. However, in the midst of these inspiring discussions, Ruffalo made a reference to power. In the interview, Ruffalo expressed that he felt that power doesn’t come from “the top and trickles down”. Instead, he ardently believes that power comes from “the bottom and then moves to the top”. Throughout his speech on power, he also stated that he uses his status as an actor to persuade people and to be attentive to important environmental issues. The fact that Ruffalo employs his celebrity status to persuade people to discuss and pay attention to his activist goals is a good example of soft power.
            In International Relations, the class has learned about the differences between hard and soft power. In short, hard power is utilizing coercion and force. Hard power is commonly thought of as being achieved through economic, and militaristic means. This type of power is often viewed as being more forceful and combative. It’s when one party or person tries to coerce another party or person into performing an act that they wouldn’t usually partake in. In contrast, soft power is all about the powers of persuasion. Instead of “coercing” or “forcing” a party or person to act in a specific way, it’s about changing what that party or person wants in the first place. Soft power utilizes conversation to achieve this. While soft power uses less brunt force to achieve things, it should not be mistaken for being “better” than hard power. Soft power can be just as destructive and damaging. Either way, soft power is acquiring different people to act in a certain way through coaxing and encouragement.
            These concepts tie into Mark Ruffalo’s activism by his approach to creating social change. Ruffalo doesn’t force anyone to agree with him on environmental issues through crippling them economically or militaristically. Instead, he employs soft power techniques. One example of this is that Ruffalo is a well-known and adored actor, so when he addresses an issue, people listen and it develops media attention. He has been Oscar nominated twice, and many people know him for his role as the Hulk. Ruffalo doesn’t let that overshadow his activist achievements, however he uses that to persuade people to join a specific cause. That is Ruffalo’s one true “power” so to speak, in comparison to EPA officials or government regulators. While they have the economic power and governmental power, he has social power because he is a well-known, and relatively well trusted public figure. People feel like they know him and can trust him because of his celebrity status, so it comes as no surprise that he can then use that trust and adoration to spark a discussion on different important issues.

            Of course, it also helps that Ruffalo is trying to save the environment and protect people’s lives. Many people become persuaded by these inspiring goals. It probably wouldn’t work that well for him if he tried to start a third world war or something violent and dramatic of that nature. Even so, Ruffalo has realized his niche in environmental activism, and has used it to persuade people to get on board with his cause and to care more about important issues. For this reason. Ruffalo is a great example of the powers of soft power.

8 comments:

  1. This is a good job. The US certainly has a certain amount of soft power because of people like Ruffalo and especially Clooney, Jolie, Swift, etc. that are american and often push American interests (even while critical of wars and other specific policies).

    One open question that many people debate is whether so called 'celebrity diplomacy' is actually helpful since it is rarely combined with expertise or knowledge of specific situations. What say you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think in the case of Mark Ruffalo, he is knowledgable about the issue of fracking and has made himself go out and learn more ever since he had his own personal experience with it. He went out of his way to find people that could help the situation in his town. When he saw that this was a national issue, he expanded and made an organization focused on this problem. I would not say that he is acting or being fake in this situation. However, I do know what you mean by "celebrity diplomacy". I remember seeing a picture of George Clooney lobbying politicians in my AP U.S. Government textbook from last year. We always see celebrities advertise a lot of things that are worthless. In the words of Mark Ruffalo, "Why don't we advertise something meaningful?"

      Delete
  2. Hey Baylie,

    I enjoyed reading your blog post. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to attend the event to see Mark Ruffalo. I did not know that power was one of the things that he talked about. I’m very impressed that Mark realizes he has the power to help make a change/difference in the world based on his celebrity status. I was very impressed how you compared the power and persuasion that Mark Ruffalo possesses to soft power. I definitely agree with you. People look up to celebrities all the time..I’m sure all of us do at some point. It’s normal to be inspired by people who have this sort of social status. I think it is great how Mark recognizes this and is using it to help save the environment and help protect people’s lives. Do you think that Mark has been effective with his use of soft power in regards to saving the environment?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Baylie,
    I found your post very interested and thought it was great how you tied in two things that at first appear unrelated. I really enjoyed your interpretation of power and how Mark Ruffalo uses his own influence in soft power terms. My one question would be, do you agree with his statement that power starts from the bottom and moves up? Because it seems that even though he is inspiring good and helping the world, he uses his status as a role model and celebrity, in other words the "top", in order to affect change in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Baylie,

    I too attended Ruffalo's lecture, and I really like the parallels you were able to draw here. I think the statements he made about power, both what we have as average citizens, and the power he has as a celebrity, make for very interesting points to bring into the IR circle. I really like how you centered him as a great example of soft power within our own Dickinson/ greater US culture! Thanks for sharing!
    -Amanda

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Baylie,

    I wish I attended Ruffalo's lecture, I heard that it was very interesting. I also really liked how you applied the lecture to what we are learning in class. However, I don't see these private citizens being effective in the field of international politics because they don't have any means to back up their soft power. I agree that he has a very compelling argument about climate change, which is well received by academia, but I just don't see how he could ever be effective at persuading a country like China to change its environmental policy.
    I really liked your post. Thanks for sharing!
    -Ben Soder

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting thought about Mark Ruffalo not being able to help in other countries. I agree that since he is not as admired in other countries as the United States, he would have a harder time accomplishing his goal. However, I guarantee he knows someone that would be able to help change environmental policies over seas and if not, find someone who can.

      Delete
  6. Hey Baylie,

    I wish I attended Ruffalo's lecture, I heard that it was very interesting. I also really liked how you applied the lecture to what we are learning in class. However, I don't see these private citizens being effective in the field of international politics because they don't have any means to back up their soft power. I agree that he has a very compelling argument about climate change, which is well received by academia, but I just don't see how he could ever be effective at persuading a country like China to change its environmental policy.
    I really liked your post. Thanks for sharing!
    -Ben Soder

    ReplyDelete