Jon Stenger
Globalization
and Soccer
In
the second chapter of How Soccer Explains
the World, Franklin Foer discusses the intense soccer rivalry between the
Irish Celtic team and the Scottish Rangers team. The intensity of this rivalry
originates from the religious backgrounds of the Catholic Celtic team and the
Protestant Rangers team. Both fan bases are incredibly hostile towards each
other, and their interactions sometimes lead to serious injuries and even
deaths. However, even though there is violence between these two groups, it is
nowhere near as bad as it would be if this religious conflict were fought on a
battlefield compared to a soccer field. Therefore, the globalization that has
come from this soccer rivalry, allows for a metaphorical war between these two
groups, without an actual serious conflict like some of the religious wars
happening in the Middle East.
With
religious extremists like ISIS and Al-Qaeda before them, it is clear that
religious conflicts can be extremely violent and deadly. The groups that are
“fighting” in Ireland and Scotland, the Catholics and Protestants, have a
fairly violent history themselves. But, unlike some of the extreme groups in
the Middle East, the religious groups who support these two soccer teams have
found an outlet; soccer. They metaphorically battle as they watch their
respected teams go at it on the field. They sing chants of violence and death,
but in support of their teams and not as they march to battle against the
other. Although globalization has brought together two groups that do not agree
with each other, it has also provided them with an outlet to channel this
aggression. The positive of giving these opposing groups an outlet to channel
the violence between them, out ways the negative of bringing these groups
together in potential conflict.
The
game of soccer, which is recognized worldwide, unites fans from around the
globe to support their teams. Also, lately, both the Celtic team and Rangers
have begun signing players without any sort of religious affiliation. Although
the fan bases remain mainly Catholic and Protestant, the change from purely
religiously biased team building has lessened some of the violence as emphasis
on religion has dropped off a bit. This is largely due to globalization. As teams
want to compete and win games, they must reach out to other areas; South
America, Central America, Africa, where some of the religious ideas are much
different than that of the traditional Celtic and Rangers teams. With this
change, it forces the focus on the differences in religion to be lessened, as
many fans just want to see the teams win games, regardless of what religion is
on the field.
Through
globalization and soccer, the violent religious conflict between the Celtic and
Rangers soccer teams has been given a metaphorical battlefield for these
respected groups to settle their issues on. These people can unleash some of
their anger and frustration towards the opposing group through a soccer match,
instead of in a full-blown conflict. This would not be possible without
globalization, which is why I believe globalization can be a huge factor in helping
to solve some crisis around the world.
Hi Jon,
ReplyDeleteI thought this was a really interesting blog post. I think you make an excellent point that globalization keeps states from warring with one another. The only thing I question is your last sentence, in which you say, "I believe globalization can be a huge factor in helping to solve some crisis around the world". I don't necessarily agree that globalization solves crises, I think instead globalization masks them and makes people pretend the issues aren't as bad as they are. I don't know if this is positive or not. But yes, good job!
-Baylie
Thanks Baylie I appreciate your response. I agree that globalization, at least initially, does cause some problems. I should have clarified that I meant that long term, I believe globalization can solve problems because it will eventually bring cultures together and make them more tolerant of one another. Thanks again for your insight
DeleteHi Baylie,
DeleteI agree with Jon. In the long term, globalization will benefit the global community. Globalization is currently causing issues since it is forcing different cultures to face each other in this more interconnected world. As ideologies learn to live together in peace, globalization will start to be viewed as a more positive thing. This will take time as well as discussion between countries. I do not agree that globalization masks crises, but rather brings them to the forefront. With other countries constantly checking others, there is no where to hide.
Hi Jon,
ReplyDeleteI like this post a lot, as it highlights a major plus to globalization. Do you think that the religious conflicts in the Middle East could be ended by something like soccer? I ask this because the current Celtics and Rangers conflict is a shadow of the Irish war for independence.